🔗 Share this article A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Prosperity and Hardship Are Found Cheek by Jowl in England. In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants live in properties only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall physically separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off roads and walkways that once connected them. “This is the posh-poor divide,” remarked Serenity Colley, 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.” An Increasingly Common National Picture Data from official figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, sometimes over little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a barrier. Decades of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of councils now contain a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the country. The geographical widening of poverty has coincided with a significant rise in the number of locations where disadvantaged and affluent people find themselves living side by side. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods bordered one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data. A Barrier Which Divides More Than Space At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The barrier transcends being just a symbolic division; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines. The school commute that ought to take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute journey. Reaching important services like grocery stores, schools and care homes is made more difficult. The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with instances of litter being dumped over the wall and related issues. “You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, motioning at the rusted metal wall. Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship At a local community centre, staff emphasise that need transcends addresses. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” said director a community leader. Despite being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% overall. A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and quality of surroundings. “They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “You’ll probably find many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The economic gap is evident: an average three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side comparable properties go for about £410,000. Residents speak of a tangible sense of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.” The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an ever more segregated England, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, inhabitants live in properties only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall physically separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off roads and walkways that once connected them. “This is the posh-poor divide,” remarked Serenity Colley, 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.” An Increasingly Common National Picture Data from official figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, sometimes over little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a barrier. Decades of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of councils now contain a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the country. The geographical widening of poverty has coincided with a significant rise in the number of locations where disadvantaged and affluent people find themselves living side by side. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods bordered one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data. A Barrier Which Divides More Than Space At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The barrier transcends being just a symbolic division; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines. The school commute that ought to take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute journey. Reaching important services like grocery stores, schools and care homes is made more difficult. The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with instances of litter being dumped over the wall and related issues. “You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, motioning at the rusted metal wall. Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship At a local community centre, staff emphasise that need transcends addresses. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” said director a community leader. Despite being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% overall. A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and quality of surroundings. “They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “You’ll probably find many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The economic gap is evident: an average three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side comparable properties go for about £410,000. Residents speak of a tangible sense of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.” The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an ever more segregated England, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly close neighbours.